Morocco
Quarter-finals · 7/9/2026, 8:00:00 PM
1-0
alt 0-0 · xG 1.24–0.72
4conf
actual 2-0 ✓ correct
Score-probability matrix
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
15
10
1
17
13
2
11
8
3
4
5
6
↓ France goalsMorocco goals →
Win / draw / loss
W 48%D 31%L 21%
Market
61% / 25% / 15%
France favoured (48% to win); the model's most likely scoreline is 1-0.
Confidence 4/10. Even the favoured outcome (48%) fails about 52% of the time; a single match is high variance. This one is close; treat the scoreline as indicative only.
How we got to 1-0
- 1Model fitTeam strengths fit from 15,899 matches (Dixon-Coles, recency-weighted, low-score correction ρ=-0.044). Neutral venue — no home advantage.
- 2Team strengths (log scale, vs average)France: attack +1.50, defence +1.52Morocco: attack +1.08, defence +1.55Higher attack = scores more; higher defence = concedes fewer.
- 3Expected goalsFrance: exp(base +0.15 + att +1.50 − opp.def +1.55) = 1.10Morocco: exp(base +0.15 + att +1.08 − opp.def +1.52) = 0.75“base” is the league scoring level the model fitted.
- 4Agent adjustmentsλ 1.10/0.75 → 1.24/0.72
- Tactical home attack ×1.05 — Both sides are in excellent form with no availability concerns, so factors stay near baseline. France's elite defensive record (0.4 conceded) and tactical solidity in high-stakes neutral fixtures warrant a slight tightening and modest attacking edge, while Morocco's leakier defence (1.2 conceded) suggests a small vulnerability the baseline may under-weight; their counter-attacking threat keeps their attack near neutral.
- Tactical home defence ×1.08 — Both sides are in excellent form with no availability concerns, so factors stay near baseline. France's elite defensive record (0.4 conceded) and tactical solidity in high-stakes neutral fixtures warrant a slight tightening and modest attacking edge, while Morocco's leakier defence (1.2 conceded) suggests a small vulnerability the baseline may under-weight; their counter-attacking threat keeps their attack near neutral.
- Tactical away attack ×1.02 — Both sides are in excellent form with no availability concerns, so factors stay near baseline. France's elite defensive record (0.4 conceded) and tactical solidity in high-stakes neutral fixtures warrant a slight tightening and modest attacking edge, while Morocco's leakier defence (1.2 conceded) suggests a small vulnerability the baseline may under-weight; their counter-attacking threat keeps their attack near neutral.
- Tactical away defence ×0.95 — Both sides are in excellent form with no availability concerns, so factors stay near baseline. France's elite defensive record (0.4 conceded) and tactical solidity in high-stakes neutral fixtures warrant a slight tightening and modest attacking edge, while Morocco's leakier defence (1.2 conceded) suggests a small vulnerability the baseline may under-weight; their counter-attacking threat keeps their attack near neutral.
- Context away attack ×1.02 — Both sides are in strong form with full availability, so the baseline already captures their strength well. A neutral venue removes home advantage for France. Morocco's underdog role and typical high-energy, well-organized tournament tactics give a marginal attacking lift, though their slightly leakier recent defence (1.2 conceded) nudges their defensive tightness just below neutral. Overall near-neutral adjustments as the baseline sees most relevant information.
- Context away defence ×0.98 — Both sides are in strong form with full availability, so the baseline already captures their strength well. A neutral venue removes home advantage for France. Morocco's underdog role and typical high-energy, well-organized tournament tactics give a marginal attacking lift, though their slightly leakier recent defence (1.2 conceded) nudges their defensive tightness just below neutral. Overall near-neutral adjustments as the baseline sees most relevant information.
- 5ScorelineA Poisson model on those expected goals (with ρ) gives the score-probability matrix above; its most likely cell is 1-0 at 17%. Win / draw / loss come from summing the matrix.
- 6Confidence4/10 — a sharper peak and a clearer favourite raise it; large agent moves lower it (model agreement 77%).