Norway
Round of 16 · 7/5/2026, 8:00:00 PM
2-0
alt 3-0 · xG 2.82–0.78
6conf
Score-probability matrix
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
1
7
6
2
11
8
3
10
8
4
7
6
5
6
↓ Brazil goalsNorway goals →
Win / draw / loss
W 79%D 14%L 7%
Market
51% / 26% / 23%value +48% on home
Brazil favoured (79% to win); the model's most likely scoreline is 2-0.
Confidence 6/10. Even the favoured outcome (79%) fails about 21% of the time; a single match is high variance.
How we got to 2-0
- 1Model fitTeam strengths fit from 15,899 matches (Dixon-Coles, recency-weighted, low-score correction ρ=-0.068). Neutral venue — no home advantage.
- 2Team strengths (log scale, vs average)Brazil: attack +1.12, defence +1.15Norway: attack +0.64, defence +0.41Higher attack = scores more; higher defence = concedes fewer.
- 3Expected goalsBrazil: exp(base +0.18 + att +1.12 − opp.def +0.41) = 2.42Norway: exp(base +0.18 + att +0.64 − opp.def +1.15) = 0.72“base” is the league scoring level the model fitted.
- 4Agent adjustmentsλ 2.42/0.72 → 2.82/0.78
- Tactical home attack ×1.05 — Norway's high-scoring but leaky form suggests an aggressive, front-foot approach that should generate chances (away attack up) but leaves space in transition against Brazil's pace, tightening Norway's defensive exposure (away defence down); Brazil's fluid attacking style gets a slight edge exploiting that openness, while both defences otherwise track baseline given full availability.
- Tactical away attack ×1.08 — Norway's high-scoring but leaky form suggests an aggressive, front-foot approach that should generate chances (away attack up) but leaves space in transition against Brazil's pace, tightening Norway's defensive exposure (away defence down); Brazil's fluid attacking style gets a slight edge exploiting that openness, while both defences otherwise track baseline given full availability.
- Tactical away defence ×0.9 — Norway's high-scoring but leaky form suggests an aggressive, front-foot approach that should generate chances (away attack up) but leaves space in transition against Brazil's pace, tightening Norway's defensive exposure (away defence down); Brazil's fluid attacking style gets a slight edge exploiting that openness, while both defences otherwise track baseline given full availability.
- 5ScorelineA Poisson model on those expected goals (with ρ) gives the score-probability matrix above; its most likely cell is 2-0 at 11%. Win / draw / loss come from summing the matrix.
- 6Confidence6/10 — a sharper peak and a clearer favourite raise it; large agent moves lower it (model agreement 78%).